Morality: evolutionary foundations and policy implications

نویسندگان

  • Ingela Alger
  • Jörgen W. Weibull
  • Daniel Chen
  • Jean-François Laslier
  • Assar Lindbeck
  • Erik Mohlin
چکیده

Since the publication of Adam Smith’s Wealth of Nations, it has been customary among economists to presume that economic agents are purely selfinterested. However, research in experimental and behavioral economics has shown that human motivation is more complex and that observed behavior is often better explained by additional motivational factors such as a concern for fairness, social welfare etc. As a complement to that body of work we have carried out theoretical investigations into the evolutionary foundations of human motivation (Alger andWeibull 2013, 2016). We found that natural selection, in starkly simplified but mathematically well-structured environments, favors preferences that combine self-interest with morality. Roughly speaking, the moral component evaluates one’s own action in terms of what would happen, if, hypothetically, this action were adopted by others. Such moral preferences have important implications for economic behavior. They motivate individuals to contribute to public goods, to give fair offers when they could get away with cheap offers, and to contribute to social institutions and act in environmentally friendly ways even if their individual impact is negligible. “Act only according to that maxim whereby you can, at the same time, will that it should become a universal law.” [Immanuel Kant, Groundwork of the Metaphysics of Morals, 1785] ∗Toulouse School of Economics, CNRS, and Institute for Advanced Study in Toulouse †Stockholm School of Economics, Institute for Advanced Study in Toulouse, KTH Royal Institute of Technology, and Toulouse School of Economics ‡This paper was presented at the conference “The State of Economics, The State of the World”, at the World Bank, June 8-9, 2016. It will appear as a chapter in a MIT Press book with the conference title, under editors Kaushik Basu, David Rosenblatt, and Claudia Sepulveda (Fall 2017). The authors thank Daniel Chen, Jean-François Laslier, Assar Lindbeck, Erik Mohlin, Paul Seabright, Jean Tirole, Nicolas Treich, Yu Wen, and Peter Wikman for valuable comments and suggestions.

برای دانلود رایگان متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

ثبت نام

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

منابع مشابه

Prestige and Dominance as Differential Correlates of Moral Foundations and Its Clinical Implications

Objective: The ways people use for social rank (dominance vs prestige) could explain difference attitude toward five moral foundations. The aim of this study was to investigate the differential relationship between prestige, dominance and moral foundations. Methods: This study conducted with 150 participants who respond to the moral foundation questionnaire and dominance-prestige scale. Multip...

متن کامل

The Changing National Health Service: Market-Based Reform and Morality; Comment on “Morality and Markets in the NHS”

This commentary explores some of the issues raised by Gilbert et al.short communication, Morality and Markets in the NHS. The increasing role of market mechanisms and the changing types of healthcare providers together with the use of choice and competition to drive improvements in quality in the National Health Service (NHS), all have important ethical implications. In order for the NHS to con...

متن کامل

Can Innate, Modular "Foundations" Explain Morality? Challenges for Haidt's Moral Foundations Theory

Jonathan Haidt's Moral Foundations Theory is an influential scientific account of morality incorporating psychological, developmental, and evolutionary perspectives. The theory proposes that morality is built upon five innate "foundations," each of which is believed to have been selected for during human evolution and, subsequently, tuned-up by learning during development. We argue here that al...

متن کامل

The Limits of Evolutionary Explanations of Morality: The Inclusivist Anomaly and its Implications for Evoconservatism

Traditional conservative arguments against the possibility of major moral progress or fundamental institutional reform relied on under-evidenced assumptions about the limitations of human nature. A number of contemporary thinkers from a variety of disciplines have attempted to fill this empirical gap in the conservative argument by appealing to evolutionary theory. These “evoconservatives” infe...

متن کامل

Religion and Morality

The relationship between religion and morality has long been hotly debated. Does religion make us more moral? Is it necessary for morality? Do moral inclinations emerge independently of religious intuitions? These debates, which nowadays rumble on in scientific journals as well as in public life, have frequently been marred by a series of conceptual confusions and limitations. Many scientific i...

متن کامل

ذخیره در منابع من


  با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید

عنوان ژورنال:

دوره   شماره 

صفحات  -

تاریخ انتشار 2016